登陆注册
18984300000052

第52章 IMPEACHMENT REPORTED TO THE SENATE.(11)

And in answer to the eleventh article, this respondent denies that on the 18th day of August, in the year 1866, at the City of Washington, in the District of Columbia, he did, by public speech or otherwise, declare or affirm, in substance or at all, that the thirty-ninth Congress of the United States was not a Congress of the United States authorized by the constitution to exercise legislative power under the same, or that he did then and there declare or affirm that the said thirty-ninth Congress was a Congress of only part of the States in any sense or meaning other than that ten States of the Union were denied representation therein; or that he made any or either of the declarations or affrmations in this behalf, in the said article alleged, as denying or intending to deny that the legislation of said thirty-ninth Congress was valid or obligatory upon this respondent, except so far as this respondent saw fit to approve the same; and as to the allegation in said article, that be did thereby intend or mean to be understood that the said Congress had not power to propose amendments to the Constitution, this respondent says that in said address he said nothing in reference to the subject of amendments of the Constitution. nor was the question of the competency of the said Congress to propose such amendments, without the participation of said excluded States. at the time of said address in any way mentioned or considered or referred to by this respondent. nor in what he did say had he any intent regarding the same, and he denies the allegation so made to the contrary thereof. But this respondent, in further answer to, and in respect of, the said allegations of the said eleventh article hereinbefore traversed and denied, claims and insists upon his personal and official right of freedom of opinion and freedom of speech, and his duty in his political relations as President of the United States to the people of the United States in the exercise of such freedom of opinion and freedom of speech, in the same manner, form and effect as he has in this behalf stated the same in his answer to the said tenth article, and with the same effect as if he here repeated the same; and he further claims and insists, as in said answer to said tenth article he has claimed and insisted, that he is not subject to question, inquisition, impeachment, or inculpation, in any form or manner, of or concerning such rights of freedom of opinion or freedom of speech or his alleged exercise thereof.

And this respondent further denies that on the 21st day of February, in the year 1868, or at any other time, at the City of Washington, in the District of Columbia, in pursuance of any such declaration as is in that behalf in said eleventh article alleged, or otherwise, he did unlawfully, and in disregard of the requirement of the Constitution that he should take care that the laws should be faithfully executed, attempt to prevent the execution of an act entitled "An act regulating the tenure of certain civil offices," passed March 2, 1867, by unlawfully devising or contriving, or attempting to devise or contrive, means by which he should prevent Edwin M. Stanton from forthwith resuming the functions of Secretary for the Department of War, or by lawfully devising or contriving, or attempting to devise or contrive, means to prevent the execution of an act entitled "An act making appropriations for the support of the army for the fiscal year ending June 30, 1868, and for other purposes,"approved March 2, 1867, or to prevent the execution of an act entitled "An act to provide for the more efficient government of the rebel States," passed March 2, 1867.

And this respondent, further answering the said eleventh article, says that he has, in his answer to the first article, set forth in detail the acts, steps, and proccedings done and taken by this respondent to and toward or in the matter of the suspension or removal of the said Edwin M. Stanton in or from the office of Secretary for the Department of War, with the times, modes, circumstances, intents, views, purposes, and opinions of official obligation and duty under and with which such acts, steps, and proceedings were done and taken; and he makes answer to this eleventh article of the matters in his answer to the first article, pertaining to the suspension or removal of said Edwin M.

Stanton, to the same intent and effect as if they were here repeated and set forth.

And this deponent, further answering the said eleventh article, denies that by means or reason of anything in said article alleged, this respondent, as President of the United States, did, on the 21st day of February, 1868, or at any other day or time.

commit, or that he was guilty of, a high misdemeanor in office.

And this respondent, further answering the said eleventh article, says that the same and the matters therein contained do not charge or allege the commission of any act whatever by this respondent, in his office of President of the United States, nor the omission by this respondent of any act of official obligation or duty in his office of President of the United States; nor does the said article nor the matters therein contained name designate, describe, or define any act or mode or form of attempt, device, contrivance, or means, or of attempt at device, contrivance or means, whereby this respondent can know or understand what act or mode or form of attempt, device, contrivance or means, or of attempt at device, contrivance, or means are imputed to or charged against this respondent, in his office of President of the United States, or intended so to be, or whereby this respondent can more fully or definitely make answer unto the said article than he hereby does.

And this respondent, in submitting to this honorable court this his answer to the articles of impeachment exhibited against him, respectfully reserves leave to amend and add to the same from time to time, as may become necessary or proper, and when and as such necessity and propriety shall appear.

Andrew Johnson Henry Stanbery, B. R. Curtis, Thomas A. R. Nelson, William M.

Evarts. W. S. Groesbeck. Of Counsel.

同类推荐
  • 夷白斋诗话

    夷白斋诗话

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
  • 东槎纪略

    东槎纪略

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
  • 绛云楼题跋

    绛云楼题跋

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。
  • 智覃正禅师语录

    智覃正禅师语录

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。
  • THE HISTORY

    THE HISTORY

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
热门推荐
  • 九阳邪尊

    九阳邪尊

    纯阳之体,至阴邪胎,阴阳互合。穿越人士楚秦踏上修行路,奇遇艳遇不绝:闯地宫,吞心火,神功邪法海百川,终成一代邪尊!
  • 史上最强催眠师

    史上最强催眠师

    仙佛已死,神魔不存。这个世界便需要这样一个人!剑试天下,瞰俯苍生。凝炼玄黄,掌握乾坤。......且看他如何以鲜血浇铸催眠之术,上演史上最强之神话!!!
  • 禹贡锥指略例

    禹贡锥指略例

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
  • 《豪门夺爱:原来你一直都在》

    《豪门夺爱:原来你一直都在》

    “阿雄,只因你说你需要的女人是可以帮助你的,我放弃了我的梦想,为你变成事业女强人。只因你说你需要的女人是可以拿出手的,我放弃了我的最爱,为你变成公关名媛。只因你说你需要的女人是要下得厨房的,我放弃了我的尊严,为你变成保姆女佣。因为爱你我愿意放弃尊严,生命,甚至.......”“女人,你最好记住你-不-配-我-爱-你1”看这那张熟悉又陌生的妖孽脸庞,我还能说什么,只是默默流下最后一滴眼泪。心里把没有说完的话补上“因为爱你,我愿意,放弃我自己,甚至是你”
  • 报告女王大人

    报告女王大人

    在地铁站遇到的奇怪女孩,开场白居然是约炮?打跑了过来骚扰的小混混,才知道女孩的身份居然是传说中的女神?然后那些小混混也是神??我所居住的城市,居然变成了诸神的战场??十尊神,一死生,要怎样才能做出正确的抉择?来吧!让我加入这场众神之战!然后,让我把这真相看得明明白白!话说,莉莉丝你能不能少损我两句?
  • 好马来吃回头草

    好马来吃回头草

    细心温柔的初恋情人;帅气耀眼,完美暖男的现任闺蜜;花样美男,独特气质的超级男模……面对众多帅哥倾心追求,她却望着苍茫的天空——是谁说,苏筱筱和林墨言不会在一起?“小姐,小心!”逃过一劫的苏筱筱跌坐在地上,眼泪不可抑制的:原来他再也不会陪我过马路了……
  • 赠你一场盛世繁华

    赠你一场盛世繁华

    我的未婚夫赵彦有了外遇,我跟踪外遇对象的哥哥贺子华。我高傲的甩了赵彦,又用肚子逼贺子华娶我。豪门婚姻里,充斥着刀光剑影的算计,贺子华的前女友屡次置我于不义,我的前男友又到处给我使绊子。贺子华说:“沈珂,你太让我失望了,我一直忍你,就是看在你肚子的份上,没想到你根本不能生育!”他还说:“你走吧,别再让我见到你。”我拿着离婚协议,净身出户。三年后,我支教归来,为了生计入职了一家广告公司。岂料他竟然是幕后BOSS!他逼问我那个和他一个模子刻出来的孩子,到底是谁的?我高傲的笑笑:“石头里蹦出来的!”他把我推到:“你倒是再蹦个我看看!”有种爱情,由恨起,因爱终,有种婚姻,路坎坷,终圆满。
  • 这个王妃不好惹

    这个王妃不好惹

    林天瑜,京城幻云楼的掌柜,飘逸洒脱,风流天下,不拘权势,有着一张女子见了羡慕,男子看了妒忌的俊脸。谁又知道,他这位俊美绝伦的侠客,实际是个,令满朝大臣惊叹不已,集琴、棋、书、画与仁爱、智慧于一身的辰逸王的王妃楚青芸。世人都说,楚青芸为了劝自己的夫君欧阳辰逸出征而被妖陷害,命丧和阳宫。可谁又知道,她却于林天瑜的身份出现在众人视野。一朝三国乱,一袭白衣脱颖而出,天豪国一战天下皆知,开创新一代无敌神帅。且看他如何智劝取紫玉关,艺压天下,威振沙场……
  • 每天学点金融学

    每天学点金融学

    金融学本来就是一门来自生活的科学。从银行存款到银行借款,从物价上涨到利率调整,从基金股票到外汇期货,到处闪现着金融学原理的影子。本书通过许多浅显易懂的故事,贴近生活的内容,以读者喜闻乐见的方式,把金融学的知识向读者一一讲述。使读者既不感到枯燥乏味,又能在轻松阅读中学习金融学知识。
  • 亡灵手记

    亡灵手记

    那一夜,我遵循了他的引导,黑红色的封面,映衬着一颗赤红色骷髅头的残影,我用我的余光与他的目光相对。它能轻易碾压世间的罪孽,不管你是善良,还是邪恶。罪孽,不需要评判。这是死神的笔记。—————亡灵手记