Which brings us again, after this long way about, to Jane Austen and her novels, and that troublesome question about them. She was great and they were beautiful, because she and they were honest, and dealt with nature nearly a hundred years ago as realism deals with it to-day. Realism is nothing more and nothing less than the truthful treatment of material, and Jane Austen was the first and the last of the English novelists to treat material with entire truthfulness. Because she did this, she remains the most artistic of the English novelists, and alone worthy to be matched with the great Scandinavian and Slavic and Latin artists. It is not a question of intellect, or not wholly that. The English have mind enough; but they have not taste enough; or, rather, their taste has been perverted by their false criticism, which is based upon personal preference, and not upon, principle; which instructs a man to think that what he likes is good, instead of teaching him first to distinguish what is good before he likes it. The art of fiction, as Jane Austen knew it, declined from her through Scott, and Bulwer, and Dickens, and Charlotte Bronte, and Thackeray, and even George Eliot, because the mania of romanticism had seized upon all Europe, and these great writers could not escape the taint of their time; but it has shown few signs of recovery in England, because English criticism, in the presence of the Continental masterpieces, has continued provincial and special and personal, and has expressed a love and a hate which had to do with the quality of the artist rather than the character of his work. It was inevitable that in their time the English romanticists should treat, as Senor Valdes says, "the barbarous customs of the Middle Ages, softening and distorting them, as Walter Scott and his kind did;" that they should "devote themselves to falsifying nature, refining and subtilizing sentiment, and modifying psychology after their own fancy," like Bulwer and Dickens, as well as like Rousseau and Madame de Stael, not to mention Balzac, the worst of all that sort at his worst. This was the natural course of the disease; but it really seems as if it were their criticism that was to blame for the rest: not, indeed, for the performance of this writer or that, for criticism can never affect the actual doing of a thing; but for the esteem in which this writer or that is held through the perpetuation of false ideals. The only observer of English middle-class life since Jane Austen worthy to be named with her was not George Eliot, who was first ethical and then artistic, who transcended her in everything but the form and method most essential to art, and there fell hopelessly below her.
同类推荐
热门推荐
邪王宠之绝世妖妃
御花园内,十岁的东篱四皇子亮出自己白嫩的小胳膊,对眼前的小丫头诱惑道:“叫爹爹就给喝。”小丫头吐掉嘴里的草根,清脆地喊了一声:“爹爹。”书房内,十五岁的四皇子抹掉自己指尖的血滴,柔声:“喊我哥哥,让你喝个饱。”小丫头甩开眼前的鬼画符,扑过来,亲昵地喊:“哥哥。”新房内,二十岁的四皇子掀开眼前碍眼的红绸,将自己白天鹅一样优美的脖颈送到小丫头面前,咬牙说:“叫我夫君,我让你喝一辈子。”小丫头晃了晃自己的嫁衣,笑的无辜:“哥哥,洞房花烛夜调戏你弟妹,这不好吧?”*************她,血域一族近百年来唯一一个纯血圣子,只因在母体呆了十五个月,被其生父疑为孽种,出生即被扔给府中管家处理。她,镇国将军府最受宠的小女儿,自小集万千宠爱于一身,五岁那年,将军府遭人诬陷,被灭九族。她,只一面之缘便被孤僻残暴的东篱四皇子认作女儿,自此,走上了傍小爹爹大腿的狗血之路。**************他,自娘胎便带着一种怪病,除了生母,旁人哪怕碰到他的一片衣角,都能让其呕吐昏厥,却偏偏能得皇帝的格外偏爱。他,自小被推上一人之下万人之上的位置,却原来只是最爱戴的父亲替兄弟们竖起的挡箭牌,磨刀石。他,冷心冷情,却在自己都不知道的时候,让那个小丫头闯入了心底最柔软的位置,既然入了他的心,那么,这辈子就别想离开他半步。***************下面片段君:“哎呀,娘亲,铮儿头疼,想吐——”小宝宝赖在自家娘亲怀中,狡黠地朝来人吐了吐舌头。宫爷爷说爹爹就是这么黏上娘亲的,撕都撕不下来。女子来不及查看,怀中的小不点被扔了出去,男子低吼声在耳边响起:“这是我媳妇,你想抱,自己找媳妇去。”“别闹,铮儿说不定是遗传你,不能靠近别人。”女子挣扎道。男子冷哼一声:“我是五岁好转,他是五岁刚得,有这么遗传的怪病?”注:本文男强女强,双宠,可以有狗血,还有萌宝宝,喜欢的妞们记得收藏哦,么么哒!匆匆那年的时光
她—从小有着非同一般的家庭,一个爱她的父母,宠她的哥哥,还要他的小学同学,也是他家邻居,后来她的父亲的公司经历金融危机,公司全盘破产,家里一夜间从高处甩向最底层,家里欠了一屁股债,最后,父母离异了,哥哥跟随妈妈到英国去,她和爸爸一起生活。虽然和哥哥分开了,但是他们之间的兄妹感情一直很好,经常联系。哥哥承诺要一直保护她!她邻家的哥哥,和她是小学同学,几次偶遇!她心里一直记住了她的样子。很快就过了10年了,哥哥要从国外回来了,她去接最爱她的哥哥,但另一个他???也回国了!十年后的他们一次擦肩而过!还能再续前缘!哥哥和他开始争夺冷雨汐的故事才刚刚开始.他们之间又会擦出怎么样的火花呢