登陆注册
19098000000021

第21章 (3)

But in commerce 100 such quarters would never have been worth more than 50. By changing the name we do not change the thing. The quantity of wheat, whither supplied or demanded, will be neither decreased nor increased by this mere change of name. Thus, the relation between supply and demand being just the same in spite of this change of name, the price of wheat will undergo no real change. When we speak of the supply and demand of things, we do not speak of the supply and demand of the name of things.

Philip I was not a maker of gold and silver, as M. Proudhon says; he was a maker of names for coins. Pass off your French cashmeres as Asiatic cashmeres, and you may deceive a buyer or two; but once the fraud becomes known, your so-called Asiatic cashmeres will drop to the price of French cashmeres.

When he put a false label on gold and silver, King Philip could deceive only so long as the fraud was not known. Like any other shopkeeper, he deceived his customers by a false description of his wares, which could not last for long. He was bound sooner or later to suffer the rigour of commercial laws. Is this what M. Proudhon wanted to prove? No. According to him, it is from the sovereign and not from commerce that money gets its value. And what has he really proved? That commerce is more sovereign than the sovereign. Let the sovereign decree that one mark shall in future be two marks, commerce will keep on saying that these two marks are worth no more than one mark was formerly.

But, for all that, the question of value determined by the quantity of labor has not been advanced a step. It still remains to be decided whether the value of these two marks (which have become what one mark was once)is determined by the cost of production or by the law of supply and demand.

M. Proudhon continues: "It should even be borne in mind that if, instead of debasing the currency, it had been in the king's power to double its bulk, the exchange value of gold and silver would immediately have dropped by half, always from reasons of proportion and equilibrium."[I 71]

If this opinion, which M. Proudhon shares with the other economists, is valid, it argues in favor of the latter's doctrine of supply and demand, and in no way in favor of M. Proudhon's proportionality. For, whatever the quantity of labor embodied in the doubled bulk of gold and silver, its value would have dropped by half, the demand having remained the same and the supply having doubled. Or can it be, by any chance, that the "law of proportionality" would have become confused this time with the so much disdained law of supply and demand? This true proportion of M. Proudhon's is indeed so elastic, is capable of so many variations, combination and permutations, that it might well coincide for once with the relation between supply and demand.

To make "every commodity acceptable in exchange, if not in practice then at least by right", on the basis of the role of gold and silver is, then, to misunderstand this role. Gold and silver are acceptable by right only because they are acceptable in practice; and they are acceptable in practice because the present organization of production needs a universal medium of exchange. Right is only the official recognition of fact.

We have seen that the example of money as an application of value which has attained constitution was chosen by M. Proudhon only to smuggle through his whole doctrine of exchangeability, that is to say, to prove that every commodity assessed by its cost of production must attain the status of money. All this would be very fine, were it not for the awkward fact that precisely gold and silver, as money, are of all commodities the only ones not determined by their cost of production; and this is so true that in circulation they can be replaced by paper. So long as there is a certain proportion observed between the requirements of circulation and the amount of money issued, be it paper, gold, platinum, or copper money, there can be no question of a proportion to be observed between the intrinsic value (cost of production) and the nominal value of money. Doubtless, in international trade, money is determined, like any other commodity, by labor time. But it is also true that gold and silver in international trade are means of exchange as products and not as money. In other words, they lose this characteristic of "stability and authenticity", of "sovereign consecration", which, for M. Proudhon, forms their specific characteristic.

Ricardo understood the truth so well that, after basing his whole system on value determined by labor time, and after saying:

"Gold and silver, like all other commodities, are valuable only in proportion to the quantity of labor necessary to produce them, and bring them to market", he adds, nevertheless, that the value of money is not determined by the labor time its substance embodies, but by the law of supply and demand only.

"Though it [paper money] has no intrinsic value, yet, by limiting its quantity, its value in exchange is as great as an equal denomination of coin, or of bullion in that coin. On the same principle, too, namely, by limitation of its quantity, a debased coin would circulate at the value it should bear, if it were of the legal weight and fineness, and not at the value of the quantity of metal which it actually contained. In the history of the British coinage, we find, accordingly, that the currency was never depreciated in the same proportion that it was debased; the reason of which was, that it never was increased in quantity, in proportion to its diminished intrinsic value."(Ricardo, loc. cit. [pp.206-07])

This is what J. B. Say observes on this passage of Ricardo's:

"This example should suffice, I think, to convince the author that the basis of all value is not the amount of labor needed to make a commodity, but the need felt for that commodity, balanced by its scarcity."[ The reference is to Say's note on the French edition of Ricardo's book, Vol.II, pp.206-07. ]

同类推荐
热门推荐
  • FateReverse

    FateReverse

    这是圣杯解体数十年后所发生的故事。魔术协会想方设法复原了圣杯,并再次开启了圣杯战争,来自于各方的七位Master与自己的Servant联手再次上演了这场名为希望,却实为残酷的战争。他们命运就如同一枚枚齿轮,在巨大的转盘上互相辗碾着前行,然而——在胜利的彼岸,又会有怎样的结局?
  • 面具女孩很倾城

    面具女孩很倾城

    她后天形成的疤,让她对世界失望,是她点亮了她的世界。
  • 一妃二王宠上天

    一妃二王宠上天

    一场预谋已久的大祸,百年兴盛的王国便毁于一旦,她出生皇家,虽躲过大火得以苟全性命,但终究还是落得流放的罪名。自负倾城容光,卖入青楼,一举夺得花魁之称,自此以面纱示天下人。一次真心,嫁入许家,本以为苦日子便到了尽头,莫不想居然卷入了一场阴谋!她屡遭背叛,不甘心!浴火三头凤磐涅重生,再度风华归来,惊艳世间。从此一袭红衣,绝代风华,引天下长歌!女王觉醒,辱我者,杀!
  • GT终结梦幻

    GT终结梦幻

    这是一个来自远古的神话故事,2514年,当地球的人类因为战争而引起临近灭亡阶段,有一部分的人为了得到大自然奇异的力量,所以迈向艰苦的修炼道路,直到地球要灭亡的一瞬间,主角法玛因通过修炼入定,基本可以看清人世间的轮回现象,他深深知道人类死了之后还会来到其它世界继续生存,因为坚定不变的意念推动他来到了一个神秘的地方。从此,宇宙各个善神将与他并肩作战对付地狱魔界之众。
  • 世界最具财富性的企业精英(3)

    世界最具财富性的企业精英(3)

    我的课外第一本书——震撼心灵阅读之旅经典文库,《阅读文库》编委会编。通过各种形式的故事和语言,讲述我们在成长中需要的知识。
  • 璃心公主撞到爱

    璃心公主撞到爱

    她是花音魔法学院精英中的精英,长相可人,曾经,她以为自己所拥有的都令人羡慕,可!原来一切都是不可触及的那般遥远.原来,她自己所爱的恋人竟不是真的爱她.想要自己的璃心是吗?偏不给你!想要自己原谅你是吗?我偏不要!
  • 养生导引秘籍

    养生导引秘籍

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。
  • 别让坏心态毁了你

    别让坏心态毁了你

    本书旨在使读者以一种平和的心态去对待生活中的拥有和失去,凡事看得淡一点,给自己一份愉快的心情,好生活。
  • 冒牌召唤师

    冒牌召唤师

    他是最强的武师,还是最强的魔法师,更是最强大的召唤师,可他却想告诉大家,其实,他的真正身份乃是一名机甲骑士!非看不可的理由:剑技魔法无一不精,修炼泡妞齐头并进,史上最强悍最全能的召唤师就此诞生!
  • 忧恋倾绯

    忧恋倾绯

    她,家世贫穷,有朝一日,终于通过了自己的努力考上了著名的绯樱学院。他,富家子弟,玩世不恭,花钱如流水。只因她穷,他对她百般刁难。而她却不看在眼里。绯樱倾恋,看他们,如何能塑造青春传奇,演绎不一样的人生。