登陆注册
19466800000215

第215章 THE SIXTH ENNEAD(7)

It may however be urged that while the possession of that character makes it a quale, it is a relative in so far as it directs upon an external object the power indicated by its name.Why, then, is not "boxer" a relative, and "boxing" as well? Boxing is entirely related to an external object; its whole theory pre-supposes this external.And in the case of the other arts- or most of them-investigation would probably warrant the assertion that in so far as they affect the soul they are qualities, while in so far as they look outward they are active and as being directed to an external object are relatives.They are relatives in the other sense also that they are thought of as habits.

Can it then be held that there is any distinct reality implied in activity, seeing that the active is something distinct only according as it is a quale? It may perhaps be held that the tendency towards action of living beings, and especially of those having freewill, implies a reality of activity [as well as a reality of Quality].

But what is the function of the active in connection with those non-living powers which we have classed as qualities? Doubtless to recruit any object it encounters, making the object a participant in its content.

But if one same object both acts and is acted upon, how do we then explain the active? Observe also that the greater- in itself perhaps a fixed three yards' length- will present itself as both greater and less according to its external contacts.

It will be objected that greater and less are due to participation in greatness and smallness; and it might be inferred that a thing is active or passive by participation in activity or passivity.

This is the place for enquiring also whether the qualities of the Sensible and Intellectual realms can be included under one head- a question intended only for those who ascribe qualities to the higher realm as well as the lower.And even if Ideal Forms of qualities are not posited, yet once the term "habit" is used in reference to Intellect, the question arises whether there is anything common to that habit and the habit we know in the lower.

Wisdom too is generally admitted to exist There.Obviously, if it shares only its name with our wisdom, it is not to be reckoned among things of this sphere; if, however, the import is in both cases the same, then Quality is common to both realms- unless, of course, it be maintained that everything There, including even intellection, is Substance.

This question, however, applies to all the categories: are the two spheres irreconcilable, or can they be co-ordinated with a unity?

13.With regard to Date:

If "yesterday," "to-morrow," "last year" and similar terms denote parts of time, why should they not be included in the same genus as time? It would seem only reasonable to range under time the past, present and future, which are its species.But time is referred to Quantity; what then is the need for a separate category of Date?

If we are told that past and future- including under past such definite dates as yesterday and last year which must clearly be subordinate to past time- and even the present "now" are not merely time but time- when, we reply, in the first place, that the notion of time- when involves time; that, further, if "yesterday" is time-gone-by, it will be a composite, since time and gone-by are distinct notions: we have two categories instead of the single one required.

But suppose that Date is defined not as time but as that which is in time; if by that which is in time is meant the subject- Socrates in the proposition "Socrates existed last year"- that subject is external to the notion of time, and we have again a duality.

Consider, however, the proposition "Socrates- or some action-exists at this time"; what can be the meaning here other than "in a part of time"? But if, admitted that Date is "a part of time," it be felt that the part requires definition and involves something more than mere time, that we must say the part of time gone by, several notions are massed in the proposition: we have the part which qua part is a relative; and we have "gone-by" which, if it is to have any import at all, must mean the past: but this "past," we have shown, is a species of time.

It may be urged that "the past" is in its nature indefinite, while "yesterday" and "last year" are definite.We reply, first, that we demand some place in our classification for the past: secondly, that "yesterday," as definite past, is necessarily definite time.But definite time implies a certain quantity of time: therefore, if time is quantitative, each of the terms in question must signify a definite quantity.

Again, if by "yesterday" we are expected to understand that this or that event has taken Place at a definite time gone by, we have more notions than ever.Besides, if we must introduce fresh categories because one thing acts in another- as in this case something acts in time- we have more again from its acting upon another in another.This point will be made plain by what follows in our discussion of Place.

14.The Academy and the Lyceum are places, and parts of Place, just as "above," "below," "here" are species or parts of Place; the difference is of minuter delimitation.

If then "above," "below," "the middle" are places- Delphi, for example, is the middle [of the earth]- and "near-the-middle" is also a place- Athens, and of course the Lyceum and the other places usually cited, are near the middle- what need have we to go further and seek beyond Place, admitting as we do that we refer in every instance to a place?

If, however, we have in mind the presence of one thing in another, we are not speaking of a single entity, we are not expressing a single notion.

Another consideration: when we say that a man is here, we present a relation of the man to that in which he is, a relation of the container to the contained.Why then do we not class as a relative whatever may be produced from this relation?

同类推荐
热门推荐
  • Latter-Day Pamphlets

    Latter-Day Pamphlets

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
  • 重装魔

    重装魔

    “仅代表和谐之神,惩罚不守序之徒!”这是在非典型无限世界中。一名拥有恶魔身躯的研究人员找到自己的目标后,与敌人互相坑爹的故事。如果人类掌握1000年后的科技,在现代人看来其实和魔法无异。足够好的科学家配合无限丰富的材料,再加上各个世界之中的各种科技,最后将给无限世界带来怎样的颠覆?
  • 天才方程式

    天才方程式

    一个称霸全球的超级企业,垄断无数行业的巨无霸,光鲜亮丽的外表下隐藏着冷酷无情的管理规则。一个初出茅庐的愣头青,一头扎进了这个深不见底的漩涡中。这是一场牵扯巨大利益的纷争,更是一场科技智能与人性的战争!
  • 剑仙情途

    剑仙情途

    朦懂少年涉仙路,仙路迢迢,困难重重,他能走多远?一路上风风雨雨,爱恨情仇,恩恩怨怨,谁能说得清?一卷仙途,半世红尘,戛然回首,只余伊人影。一度坐看枫叶凋落,却不知伊人隐没,在天涯。恍如隔世!
  • 元始天魔王

    元始天魔王

    元始界,强者林立,高手如云。元始神殿高高在上,众生皆拜元始天王。穿越者聂盘,还在地球时,就无法无天,为报救命之恩,一日手刃五人,成极度重犯。初至异界,便拜“银发魔女”为师,修炼“神武道”。并得魔女赠以神丹,易筋洗髓,脱胎换骨。而那魔女,因质疑创世神“元始天王”,受到“元始神殿”追杀通缉,早成举世公敌!身为魔女传人,聂盘又岂能置身事外?那一条忤逆万神的踏天之路,注定血雨腥风!……我独行于世,举世皆敌。但我从未犹豫害怕。富贵如云、权势滔天、修为盖世,统统压服不了我。我从不欺善怕恶,从不恃强凌弱,从不苟且投降。一路走来,血雨腥风。只手斩尽荆棘,单身辟出坦途,踏上通天大道。我就是聂盘。人们叫我”天魔”。
  • 二次元神秘之旅

    二次元神秘之旅

    第一次英雄救美,谁知居然发生了意想不到的事。他看到他变成了“她”,而且还有一个拿着死神镰刀,穿着妖娆的女子,从虚空涟漪中走了出来。最为诡异的是,这个死神少女居然还对他露出了笑容。不过,死神少女的第一句话,却是让他险些崩溃,“少年,你是光明女神的转世......”从此,唐琦过上了幸福的生活,在魔法世界,她是万人瞩目的神继魔导士,掌握着改变世界的力量;在现实世界,她是作家、漫画家、国手配音,是交际明星,是人生赢家!
  • 恶少逼婚:女人乖乖让我爱

    恶少逼婚:女人乖乖让我爱

    仲轩漠是云阳城赫赫有名的权贵,内敛深沉,强悍凌厉,却没想到在个街头小巷被一个女人给壁咚了,还夺走了守了二十八年的初吻?他发誓一定要找到她,然后呢?狠狠的吻回来。再次相遇,他们同时失恋,他把她给胸咚了,将手中的戒指套在了她手上,“女人,你要对我负责!”OMG的,那么多大总裁滚了床单都不负责的,她就这么轻轻的吻了一下,要负什么责啊?“这位先生,你是侏罗纪世界出来的?”某男挑着略带深意的唇角,“是啊,你最好不要惹恼一只大型猛兽,否则后果……”怀中女人脸色立马变了,冷冷的回了他一句,“你有病!”“我们现在就去民政局领证去。”他极尽所能的爱她,疼她,宠她,只因为她是他的老婆!
  • 优秀员工九商树

    优秀员工九商树

    如果你想要在职场中脱颖而出,让自己成为一个公司不可或缺的人,需要的不仅仅是出色的工作能力,还必须具有工作能力以外的成功素质,比如良好的道德素质、健康的身心,等等。也许你认为成功的素质对于你来说只是一个很模糊的概念,很难找到一个真正提升自己的方法,那么现在,你将会在《优秀员工九商树》《优秀员工九商树》中找到答案,《优秀员工九商树》将为你的职业之树找到汲取养分的途径。
  • 联盟修道院

    联盟修道院

    鬼怪之说,自古流传,无论中外皆有不少灵异奇谈。第105世纪,由华夏主导的地球联盟已成立3800多年。灵魂的存在已经证明,僵尸的形成原因也已破解。联盟3852年,联盟修道院成立1000周年。从最初的驱邪捉鬼到如今对修真的研究、企图破解长生之谜的欲望,联盟修道院成立的初衷已彻底改变。孤儿秋叶就是在此时加入了联盟修道院!
  • 一曲离人歌—古剑