登陆注册
19466800000215

第215章 THE SIXTH ENNEAD(7)

It may however be urged that while the possession of that character makes it a quale, it is a relative in so far as it directs upon an external object the power indicated by its name.Why, then, is not "boxer" a relative, and "boxing" as well? Boxing is entirely related to an external object; its whole theory pre-supposes this external.And in the case of the other arts- or most of them-investigation would probably warrant the assertion that in so far as they affect the soul they are qualities, while in so far as they look outward they are active and as being directed to an external object are relatives.They are relatives in the other sense also that they are thought of as habits.

Can it then be held that there is any distinct reality implied in activity, seeing that the active is something distinct only according as it is a quale? It may perhaps be held that the tendency towards action of living beings, and especially of those having freewill, implies a reality of activity [as well as a reality of Quality].

But what is the function of the active in connection with those non-living powers which we have classed as qualities? Doubtless to recruit any object it encounters, making the object a participant in its content.

But if one same object both acts and is acted upon, how do we then explain the active? Observe also that the greater- in itself perhaps a fixed three yards' length- will present itself as both greater and less according to its external contacts.

It will be objected that greater and less are due to participation in greatness and smallness; and it might be inferred that a thing is active or passive by participation in activity or passivity.

This is the place for enquiring also whether the qualities of the Sensible and Intellectual realms can be included under one head- a question intended only for those who ascribe qualities to the higher realm as well as the lower.And even if Ideal Forms of qualities are not posited, yet once the term "habit" is used in reference to Intellect, the question arises whether there is anything common to that habit and the habit we know in the lower.

Wisdom too is generally admitted to exist There.Obviously, if it shares only its name with our wisdom, it is not to be reckoned among things of this sphere; if, however, the import is in both cases the same, then Quality is common to both realms- unless, of course, it be maintained that everything There, including even intellection, is Substance.

This question, however, applies to all the categories: are the two spheres irreconcilable, or can they be co-ordinated with a unity?

13.With regard to Date:

If "yesterday," "to-morrow," "last year" and similar terms denote parts of time, why should they not be included in the same genus as time? It would seem only reasonable to range under time the past, present and future, which are its species.But time is referred to Quantity; what then is the need for a separate category of Date?

If we are told that past and future- including under past such definite dates as yesterday and last year which must clearly be subordinate to past time- and even the present "now" are not merely time but time- when, we reply, in the first place, that the notion of time- when involves time; that, further, if "yesterday" is time-gone-by, it will be a composite, since time and gone-by are distinct notions: we have two categories instead of the single one required.

But suppose that Date is defined not as time but as that which is in time; if by that which is in time is meant the subject- Socrates in the proposition "Socrates existed last year"- that subject is external to the notion of time, and we have again a duality.

Consider, however, the proposition "Socrates- or some action-exists at this time"; what can be the meaning here other than "in a part of time"? But if, admitted that Date is "a part of time," it be felt that the part requires definition and involves something more than mere time, that we must say the part of time gone by, several notions are massed in the proposition: we have the part which qua part is a relative; and we have "gone-by" which, if it is to have any import at all, must mean the past: but this "past," we have shown, is a species of time.

It may be urged that "the past" is in its nature indefinite, while "yesterday" and "last year" are definite.We reply, first, that we demand some place in our classification for the past: secondly, that "yesterday," as definite past, is necessarily definite time.But definite time implies a certain quantity of time: therefore, if time is quantitative, each of the terms in question must signify a definite quantity.

Again, if by "yesterday" we are expected to understand that this or that event has taken Place at a definite time gone by, we have more notions than ever.Besides, if we must introduce fresh categories because one thing acts in another- as in this case something acts in time- we have more again from its acting upon another in another.This point will be made plain by what follows in our discussion of Place.

14.The Academy and the Lyceum are places, and parts of Place, just as "above," "below," "here" are species or parts of Place; the difference is of minuter delimitation.

If then "above," "below," "the middle" are places- Delphi, for example, is the middle [of the earth]- and "near-the-middle" is also a place- Athens, and of course the Lyceum and the other places usually cited, are near the middle- what need have we to go further and seek beyond Place, admitting as we do that we refer in every instance to a place?

If, however, we have in mind the presence of one thing in another, we are not speaking of a single entity, we are not expressing a single notion.

Another consideration: when we say that a man is here, we present a relation of the man to that in which he is, a relation of the container to the contained.Why then do we not class as a relative whatever may be produced from this relation?

同类推荐
  • 肇论

    肇论

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
  • 圣观自在菩萨功德赞

    圣观自在菩萨功德赞

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
  • The Peterkin Papers

    The Peterkin Papers

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
  • 安南传

    安南传

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。
  • 佛说大集会正法经

    佛说大集会正法经

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。
热门推荐
  • 大亨的逃妻

    大亨的逃妻

    他是顶级钻石王老五,俊美邪气温柔冷酷。她是他的第23个情人,她不爱他却必须为他暖被。只因她爹地欠下巨款,唯有当他的情人才能还债。大亨的情人当的很乖,乖的没有半点脾气他愤怒。狠狠的彻夜要她虐她,床上的快乐褪后她怀孕了。“去医院将孩子拿掉。”他的声音真冷酷无情残酷的话让她刚刚变得温暖的心又跌回了地狱。
  • 流年似槿:你是我的北斗星

    流年似槿:你是我的北斗星

    她是孑然一身的无依孤儿,背井离市只为找到儿时唯一给过她温暖的玩伴,却在跨上那座城市的第一天,碰到那个犹如星辰的男子成就她铭刻一生的记忆。他生性冷冽,沉戾凛然,外表光鲜耀眼如辰,却也有背后的伤痕,无所依偎。他是她的北斗星,亦是R市风云到翻手为云覆手为雨的槿少,如此这般翻翻覆覆间,便是她颠沛流离的命运。云星月:如果时光可以流转,我希望我从来不曾去过R市,遇上那个叫沐流槿的男子。沐流槿:她说,你不欠我,我们两讫,如果有来生,我一定不会再倾慕于你。一定?没有一定。五年牢狱,她满身伤痕,心疮百夷。他依然高高在上,遥不可及。………只是,她已不想再做那个仰望星辰的人。………亦,不愿。沐流槿:现在不是来生,也不会有来生,我只要这辈子,所以,她还是要倾慕于他,必须倾慕于他。
  • 电竞的魅力

    电竞的魅力

    张志东.一个三好学生.家里的乖孩子在暑假回老家玩。在小伙伴的推荐下接触了英雄联盟这款游戏,顿时被深深吸引。网吧五连坐,上分之旅、参加网吧联赛、加入职业战队,历经无数坎坷,只为心之的梦想,只为追求电竞的热血!!
  • 最棒的三天与最惨的三十年

    最棒的三天与最惨的三十年

    一个小人物的一次意外经历,一段可歌可泣的感情故事。
  • The Deserted Woman

    The Deserted Woman

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
  • 你到底懂不懂我

    你到底懂不懂我

    他们相识于高中,一起经历了高考,两人之间一直都很熟悉,你一伸手我就已经知道你想要什么,是好兄弟也是好姐妹,周围的好朋友都希望他们能够突破那道屏障。高中两年没能在一起,高考完就要分开了,是注定要成为陌生人了吗?
  • 王牌之使命召唤

    王牌之使命召唤

    一切都是从一个错误开始,我来到了这里!来到了主神世界,街机世界的主神,开始了一段如同拖拉机行驶在高速马路上的拉风之旅!有时候,错误的开始,最后却能盛开最完美的花朵。“什么,你说我是一名召唤师?”“哦,不!连伊格尼斯都说我是一名出色的异能格斗家。你这说让我曾经的对手,克里斯,路卡尔,草薙京等人情何以堪?”
  • 兽血丹心

    兽血丹心

    兽人是一种超进化的人类。普通人类的身体有神经、呼吸、血液循环等八大系统,兽人则比正常人多一套兽核系统,能够以兽核中所载的基因信息为模板控制身体细胞进行重组,从而可以自由变形为人体或兽体。兽人脑中有一枚兽丹,相当于血液循环系统中的心脏,是兽核系统的的中央控制器,同时也存储兽核的容器。丹兽则是一种超进化的兽。
  • 网游之战神传说

    网游之战神传说

    李白云:天生我材必有用。但我从小只有调皮捣蛋,学习没有一点上进心,做兼职不认真,走上社会又不务正业,所以我不禁扪心自问,李白的话是真的吗?唯有进入游戏世界后,你会发现,那时的我,才是一个如同神一般的男人,没有之一。因为,整个游戏世界,都会因我的到来而颤抖。我,便是王
  • 奇幻冒险

    奇幻冒险

    随意写写,文笔很差,如果有兴趣的话可以继续看下去,总之,会努力的啦……不定期更新