登陆注册
19851600000030

第30章 WORK AND PAY(3)

There is a fundamental difference between Socialism and Anarchism as regards the question of distribution.Socialism, at any rate in most of its forms, would retain payment for work done or for willingness to work, and, except in the case of persons incapacitated by age or infirmity, would make willingness to work a condition of subsistence, or at any rate of subsistence above a certain very low minimum.Anarchism, on the other hand, aims at granting to everyone, without any conditions whatever, just as much of all ordinary commodities as he or she may care to consume, while the rarer com- modities, of which the supply cannot easily be indefinitely increased, would be rationed and divided equally among the population.Thus Anarchism would not impose any OBLIGATIONS of work, though Anarchists believe that the necessary work could be madesufficiently agreeable for the vast majority of the population to undertake it voluntarily.Socialists, on the other hand, would exact work.Some of them would make the incomes of all workers equal, while others would retain higher pay for the work which is considered more valuable.All these different systems are compatible with the common ownership of land and capital, though they differ greatly as regards the kind of society which they would produce.

Socialism with inequality of income would not differ greatly as regards the economic stimulus to work from the society in which we live.Such differences as it would entail would undoubtedly be to the good from our present point of view.Under the existing system many people enjoy idleness and affluence through the mere accident of inheriting land or capital.Many others, through their activities in industry or finance, enjoy an income which is certainly very far in excess of anything to which their social utility entitles them.On the other hand, it often happens that inventors and discoverers, whose work has the very greatest social utility, are robbed of their reward either by capitalists or by the failure of the public to appreciate their work until too late.The better paid work is only open to those who have been able to afford an expensive training, and these men are selected in the main not by merit but by luck.The wage earner is not paid for his willingness to work, but only for his utility to the employer.Consequently, he may be plunged into destitution by causes over which he has no control.Such destitution is a constant fear, and when it occurs it produces undeserved suffering, and often deterioration in the social value of the sufferer.These are a few among the evils of our existing system from the standpoint of production.All these evils we might expect to see remedied under any system of Socialism.

There are two questions which need to be considered when we are discussing how far work requires the economic motive.The first question is: Must society give higher pay for the more skilled or socially more valuable work, if such work is to be done in sufficient quantities? The second question is: Could work be made so attractive that enough of it would be done even if idlers received just as much of the produce of work? The first of these questions concerns the division between two schools ofSocialists: the more moderate Socialists sometimes concede that even under Socialism it would be well to retain unequal pay for different kinds of work, while the more thoroughgoing Socialists advocate equal incomes for all workers.The second question, on the other hand, forms a division between Socialists and Anarchists; the latter would not deprive a man of commodities if he did not work, while the former in general would.

Our second question is so much more fundamental than our first that it must be discussed at once, and in the course of this discussion what needs to be said on our first question will find its place naturally.

Wages or Free Sharing?--``Abolition of the wages system'' is one of the watchwords common to Anarchists and advanced Socialists.But in its most natural sense it is a watchword to which only the Anarchists have a right.In the Anarchist conception of society all the commoner commodities will be available to everyone without stint, in the kind of way in which water is available at present.[41] Advo- cates of this system point out that it applies already to many things which formerly had to be paid for, e.g., roads and bridges.They point out that it might very easily be extended to trams and local trains.They proceed to argue--as Kropotkin does by means of his proofs that the soil might be made indefinitely more productive--that all the commoner kinds of food could be given away to all who demanded them, since it would be easy to produce them in quantities adequate to any possible demand.If this system were extended to all the necessaries of life, everyone's bare livelihood would be secured, quite regardless of the way in which he might choose to spend his time.As for commodities which cannot be produced in indefinite quantities, such as luxuries and delicacies, they also, according to the Anarchists, are to be distributed without payment, but on a system of rations, the amount available being divided equally among the population.No doubt, though this is not said, something like a price will have to be put upon these luxuries, so that a man may be free to choose how he will take his share: one man will prefer good wine, another the finest Havana cigars, another pictures or beautiful furniture.Presumably, every man will be allowed to take such luxuries as are his due in whatever form he prefers, the relative prices being fixed so as to equalize the demand.In such a world as this,the economic stimulus to production will have wholly disappeared, and if work is to continue it must be from other motives.[42]

同类推荐
  • 异事

    异事

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
  • How He Lied to Her Husband

    How He Lied to Her Husband

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
  • 读书止观录

    读书止观录

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。
  • 樵谈

    樵谈

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。
  • 超宗慧方禅师语录

    超宗慧方禅师语录

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。
热门推荐
  • 禁牙

    禁牙

    你说我有错,很对我错信了你,错识了你错在这乱世中与你结伴而行错负了天下人所以才落得个家破人亡才被卷入这场没有止境的乱世纷争!【本文只为取悦自己,不为盈利,请勿转载】
  • 佛说贫穷老公经

    佛说贫穷老公经

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。
  • 宋词(语文新课标必读书目)

    宋词(语文新课标必读书目)

    国家教育部颁布了最新《语文课程标准》,统称新课标,对中、小学语文教学指定了阅读书目,对阅读的数量、内容、质量以及速度都提出了明确的要求,这对于提高学生的阅读能力,培养语文素养,陶冶情操,促进学生终身学习和终身可持续发展,对于提高广大人民的文学素养具有极大的意义。小学生是未来的主人,必须适应现代竞争激烈和交际广泛的社会生活,在心理、性格、思维、修养等内在素质铸造方面必须做好充分准备,同时在语言表达、社会交往等才能方面也必须打下良好的基础,这样才能顺应未来社会的发展潮流。
  • 浮世

    浮世

    风卷雪裹的旗镇,有三条远近文明的巷子:财馆好汉巷、烟馆神仙巷、妓院杏花巷;还有纸灯笼街、野鸡岭、豪华岭、豪华典雅的人头红楼,以及时常有钟声响起的北大庙和圣·尼拉大教堂。山里种罂粟的烟客,深夜出没国境走私的“扒皮老客”,杀人越货绑票抢劫的“胡子”......镇子上来了一个神秘的旅行家,裤裆街口的千年榆一夜间竟旺绿了一大枝,注定了旗镇一段撼魂动魄的兴衰传奇。作品境界内涵悠远,格调品位高雅,犹如一幅“清明上河图”的艺术长卷。
  • 混乱的秩序

    混乱的秩序

    兰德斯·李是个什么样的人?很多年以后,老人们聚在一起,开始回忆他们一生的朋友。窗外是深沉而厚重的夜,下着迷濛细雨,湿冷在空气中弥漫。墙边的壁炉被人点燃,烈火昂扬,开始驱散夜雨的严寒。“……你们可能不知道,其实有那么一段时间,兰德斯整天都是游手好闲的……而一切转变,或许得从一个法案说起……”说话的老人,穿着紫金色的术法长袍,端着红茶靠在舒适的躺椅上,胸前的花白胡须理得整整齐齐,而头顶的头发却掉的一根不剩。他琥珀色的瞳孔望着墙边壁炉的炉火,睿智而沧桑的目光仿佛穿透历史、穿透黑暗。
  • tfboys之十年后你我

    tfboys之十年后你我

    三个美少女在回国时遇见了三个美少年,他们在机场里相识、相知、相爱,并彼此发誓要永远爱对方,守护对方,在爱情的路上他们又会经历那些风风雨雨呢?但他们还是有情人终成眷属,成为了白头偕老的伴侣。
  • 偏要和陌生人说话

    偏要和陌生人说话

    《偏要和陌生人说话》全面、系统地总结出了和陌生人沟通对每个人发展的好处,分析和阐述了人们难于与陌生人结交的根本原因。它是您扩大社交圈子,获得更多好人缘不可或缺的社交利器。在每个人的人生际遇当中,可能都与陌生人有着或多或少的机缘。那么我们该如何处理这种机缘呢?
  • 小学生经典阅读(四年级上)

    小学生经典阅读(四年级上)

    本书为青少年阅读类图书,按照不同主题选取了适合小学生阅读的经典美文,选文兼顾古今中外,内容包括:理想、自由、爱国等,文章设计了“读点·点睛”、“作者介绍”、“佳句品读”、“赏析感悟”四个版块,帮助小学生读中悟写,从“愿读、会读”到“愿写、会写”。
  • 山河岁月

    山河岁月

    沈佩珊和喻河远,一个是落魄小姐,一个是军阀权贵,一场战争让他们相逢相知,命运也因此而捆绑在了一起。命定的分开,让两人两处相思,再见面时,却是两世为人——如果可以爱着你,直到岁月白头。
  • 改变生活的68个心理学故事

    改变生活的68个心理学故事

    本书所收录的故事,涵盖实验心理学、人格心理学、社会心理学等多个方面,让我们在初步了解心理学知识的同时,也对我们的内在世界有所了解,有所认识,从而使我们心眼大开,豁然开朗。