Coming now to that great majority who will not choose idleness, I think we may assume that, with the help of science, and by the elimination of the vast amount of unproductive work involved in internal and international competition, the whole community could be kept in comfort by means of four hours' work a day.It is already being urged by experienced employers that their employes can actually produce as much in a six-hour day as they can when they work eight hours.In a world where there is a much higher level of technical instruction than there is now the same tendency will be accentuated.People will be taught not only, as at present, one trade, or one small portion of a trade, but several trades, so that they can vary their occupation according to the seasons and the fluctuations of demand.Every industry will be self-governing as regards all its internal affairs, and even separate factories will decide for themselves all questions that only concern those who work in them.There will not be capitalist management, as at present, but management by elected representatives, as in politics.Relations between different groups of producers will be settled by the Guild Congress, matters concerning thecommunity as the inhabitants of a certain area will continue to be decided by Parliament, while all disputes between Parliament and the Guild Congress will be decided by a body composed of representatives of both in equal numbers.
Payment will not be made, as at present, only for work actually required and performed, but for willingness to work.This system is already adopted in much of the better paid work: a man occupies a certain position, and retains it even at times when there happens to be very little to do.The dread of unemployment and loss of livelihood will no longer haunt men like a nightmare.Whether all who are willing to work will be paid equally, or whether exceptional skill will still command exceptional pay, is a matter which may be left to each guild to decide for itself.An opera-singer who received no more pay than a scene-shifter might choose to be a scene-shifter until the system was changed: if so, higher pay would probably be found necessary.But if it were freely voted by the Guild, it could hardly constitute a grievance.
Whatever might be done toward making work agreeable, it is to be presumed that some trades would always remain unpleasant.Men could be attracted into these by higher pay or shorter hours, instead of being driven into them by destitution.The community would then have a strong economic motive for finding ways of diminishing the disagreeableness of these exceptional trades.
There would still have to be money, or something analogous to it, in any community such as we are imagining.The Anarchist plan of a free distribution of the total produce of work in equal shares does not get rid of the need for some standard of exchange value, since one man will choose to take his share in one form and another in another.When the day comes for distributing luxuries, old ladies will not want their quota of cigars, nor young men their just proportion of lap-dog; this will make it necessary to know how many cigars are the equivalent of one lap-dog.Much the simplest way is to pay an income, as at present, and allow relative values to be adjusted according to demand.But if actual coin were paid, a man might hoard it and in time become a capitalist.To prevent this, it would be best to pay notes available only during a certain period, say one year fromthe date of issue.This would enable a man to save up for his annual holiday, but not to save indefinitely.
There is a very great deal to be said for the Anarchist plan of allowing necessaries, and all commodities that can easily be produced in quantities adequate to any possible demand, to be given away freely to all who ask for them, in any amounts they may require.The question whether this plan should be adopted is, to my mind, a purely technical one: would it be, in fact, possible to adopt it without much waste and consequent diversion of labor to the production of necessaries when it might be more usefully employed otherwise? I have not the means of answering this question, but I think it exceedingly probable that, sooner or later, with the continued improvement in the methods of production, this Anarchist plan will become feasible; and when it does, it certainly ought to be adopted.
Women in domestic work, whether married or unmarried, will receive pay as they would if they were in industry.This will secure the complete economic independence of wives, which is difficult to achieve in any other way, since mothers of young children ought not to be expected to work outside the home.
