Quantity is either discrete or continuous.Moreover, some quantities are such that each part of the whole has a relative position to the other parts: others have within them no such relation of part to part.
Instances of discrete quantities are number and speech; of continuous, lines, surfaces, solids, and, besides these, time and place.
In the case of the parts of a number, there is no common boundary at which they join.For example: two fives make ten, but the two fives haveno common boundary, but are separate; the parts three and seven also do not join at any boundary.Nor, to generalize, would it ever be possible in the case of number that there should be a common boundary among the parts; they are always separate.Number, therefore, is a discrete quantity.
The same is true of speech.That speech is a quantity is evident: for it is measured in long and short syllables.I mean here that speech which is vocal.Moreover, it is a discrete quantity for its parts have no common boundary.There is no common boundary at which the syllables join, but each is separate and distinct from the rest.
A line, on the other hand, is a continuous quantity, for it is possible to find a common boundary at which its parts join.In the case of the line, this common boundary is the point; in the case of the plane, it is the line: for the parts of the plane have also a common boundary.Similarly you can find a common boundary in the case of the parts of a solid, namely either a line or a plane.
Space and time also belong to this class of quantities.Time, past, present, and future, forms a continuous whole.Space, likewise, is a continuous quantity; for the parts of a solid occupy a certain space, and these have a common boundary; it follows that the parts of space also, which are occupied by the parts of the solid, have the same common boundary as the parts of the solid.Thus, not only time, but space also, is a continuous quantity, for its parts have a common boundary.
Quantities consist either of parts which bear a relative position each to each, or of parts which do not.The parts of a line bear a relative position to each other, for each lies somewhere, and it would be possible to distinguish each, and to state the position of each on the plane and to explain to what sort of part among the rest each was contiguous.Similarly the parts of a plane have position, for it could similarly be stated what was the position of each and what sort of parts were contiguous.The same is true with regard to the solid and to space.But it would be impossible to show that the arts of a number had a relative position each to each, or a particular position, or to state what parts were contiguous.Nor could this be done in the case of time, for none of the parts of time has an abiding existence, and that which does not abide can hardly have position.Itwould be better to say that such parts had a relative order, in virtue of one being prior to another.Similarly with number: in counting, 'one' is prior to 'two', and 'two' to 'three', and thus the parts of number may be said to possess a relative order, though it would be impossible to discover any distinct position for each.This holds good also in the case of speech.None of its parts has an abiding existence: when once a syllable is pronounced, it is not possible to retain it, so that, naturally, as the parts do not abide, they cannot have position.Thus, some quantities consist of parts which have position, and some of those which have not.
Strictly speaking, only the things which I have mentioned belong to the category of quantity: everything else that is called quantitative is a quantity in a secondary sense.It is because we have in mind some one of these quantities, properly so called, that we apply quantitative terms to other things.We speak of what is white as large, because the surface over which the white extends is large; we speak of an action or a process as lengthy, because the time covered is long; these things cannot in their own right claim the quantitative epithet.For instance, should any one explain how long an action was, his statement would be made in terms of the time taken, to the effect that it lasted a year, or something of that sort.In the same way, he would explain the size of a white object in terms of surface, for he would state the area which it covered.Thus the things already mentioned, and these alone, are in their intrinsic nature quantities; nothing else can claim the name in its own right, but, if at all, only in a secondary sense.
