China will soon discover the fate that awaits a society deprived of the armour slowly wrought by the past.After a few years of bloody anarchy it will be necessary to establish a power whose tyranny will inevitably be far severer than that which was overthrown.Science has not yet discovered the magic ring capable of saving a society without discipline.There is no need to impose discipline when it has become hereditary, but when the primitive instincts have been allowed to destroy the barriers painfully erected by slow ancestral labours, they cannot be reconstituted save by an energetic tyranny.
As a proof of these assertions we may instance an experiment analogous to that undertaken by China; that recently attempted by Turkey.A few years ago young men instructed in European schools and full of good intentions succeeded, with the aid of a number of officers, in overthrowing a Sultan whose tyranny seemed insupportable.Having acquired our robust Latin faith in the magic power of formulae, they thought they could establish the representative system in a country half-civilised, profoundly divided by religious hatred, and peopled by divers races.
The attempt has not prospered hitherto.The authors of the reformation had to learn that despite their liberalism they were forced to govern by methods very like those employed by the government overthrown.They could neither prevent summary executions nor wholesale massacres of Christians, nor could they remedy a single abuse.
It would be unjust to reproach them.What in truth could they have done to change a people whose traditions have been fixed so long, whose religious passions are so intense, and whose Mohammedans, although in the minority, legitimately claim to govern the sacred city of their faith according to their code?
How prevent Islam from remaining the State religion in a country where civil law and religious law are not yet plainly separated, and where faith in the Koran is the only tie by which the idea of nationality can be maintained?
It was difficult to destroy such a state of affairs, so that we were bound to see the re-establishment of an autocratic organisation with an appearance of constitutionalism--that is to say, practically the old system once again.Such attempts afford a good example of the fact that a people cannot choose its institutions until it has transformed its mind.
4.Social elements which survive the changes of Government after Revolution.
What we shall say later on as to the stable foundation of the national soul will enable us to appreciate the force of systems of government that have been long established, such as ancient monarchies.A monarch may easily be overthrown by conspirators, but these latter are powerless against the principles which the monarch represents.Napoleon at his fall was replaced not by his natural heir, but by the heir of kings.The latter incarnated an ancient principle, while the son of the Emperor personified ideas that were as yet imperfectly established in men's minds.
For the same reason a minister, however able, however great the services he has rendered to his country, can very rarely overthrow his Sovereign.Bismarck himself could not have done so.This great minister had single-handed created the unity of Germany, yet his master had only to touch him with his finger and he vanished.A man is as nothing before a principle supported by opinion.
But even when, for various reasons, the principle incarnated by a government is annihilated with that government, as happened at the time of the French Revolution, all the elements of social organisation do not perish at the same time.
If we knew nothing of France but the disturbances of the last hundred years and more we might suppose the country to live in a state of profound anarchy.Now her economic, industrial, and even her political life manifests, on the contrary, a continuity that seems to be independent of all revolutions and governments.
The fact is that beside the great events of which history treats are the little facts of daily life which the books neglect to tell.They are ruled by imperious necessities which halt for no man.Their total mass forms the real framework of the life of the people.
While the study of great events shows us that the nominal government of France has been frequently changed in the space of a century, an examination of the little daily events will prove, on the contrary, that her real government has been little altered.
Who in truth are the real rulers of a people? Kings and ministers, no doubt, in the great crises of national life, but they play no part whatever in the little realities which make up the life of every day.The real directing forces of a country are the administrations, composed of impersonal elements which are never affected by the changes of government.Conservative of traditions, they are anonymous and lasting, and constitute an occult power before which all others must eventually bow.Their action has even increased to such a degree that, as we shall presently show, there is a danger that they may form an anonymous State more powerful than the official State.France has thus come to be governed by heads of departments and government clerks.The more we study the history of revolutions the more we discover that they change practically nothing but the label.To create a revolution is easy, but to change the soul of a people is difficult indeed.
