登陆注册
19902800000259

第259章 CHAPTER XI.(4)

The principle is, that either at the beginning, or ultimately, such questions shall or may be decided by the national tribunals. If in any suit properly cognizable in a State court the decision should turn on a clause in the Constitution, or on a law of the United States, or on the act of a national offense, or on the validity of a national act, an appeal lies to the Supreme Court of the United States and to its officers. The object has been to give to the national tribunals of the nation full cognizance of its own laws, treaties, and congressional acts.

The judges of all the national tribunals, of whatever grade or rank, hold their offices for life, and are removable only on impeachment.

They are not even removable on an address of Congress; thus holding on a firmer tenure even than our own judges, who may, I believe, be moved on an address by Parliament. The judges in America are not entitled to any pension or retiring allowances; and as there is not, as regards the judges of the national courts, any proviso that they shall cease to sit after a certain age, they are in fact immovable whatever may be their infirmities. Their position in this respect is not good, seeing that their salaries will hardly admit of their making adequate provision for the evening of life. The salary of the Chief Justice of the United States is only 1300l. per annum.

All judges of the national courts, of whatever rank, are appointed by the President, but their appointments must be confirmed by the Senate. This proviso, however, gives to the Senate practically but little power, and is rarely used in opposition to the will of the President. If the President name one candidate, who on political grounds is distasteful to a majority of the Senate, it is not probable that a second nomination made by him will be more satisfactory. This seems now to be understood, and the nomination of the cabinet ministers and of the judges, as made by the President, are seldom set aside or interfered with by the Senate, unless on grounds of purely personal objection.

The position of the national judges as to their appointments and mode of tenure is very different from that of the State judges, to whom in a few lines I shall more specially allude. This should, Ithink, be specially noticed by Englishmen when criticising the doings of the American courts. I have observed statements made to the effect that decisions given by American judges as to international or maritime affairs affecting English interests could not be trusted, because the judges so giving them would have been elected by popular vote, and would be dependent on the popular voice for reappointment. This is not so. Judges are appointed by popular vote in very many of the States. But all matters affecting shipping and all questions touching foreigners are tried in the national courts before judges who have been appointed for life. I should not myself have had any fear with reference to the ultimate decision in the affair of Slidell and Mason had the "Trent" been carried into New York. I would, however, by no means say so much had the cause been one for trial before the tribunals of the State of New York.

I have been told that we in England have occasionally fallen into the error of attributing to the Supreme Court at Washington a quasi political power which it does not possess. This court can give no opinion to any department of the government, nor can it decide upon or influence any subject that has not come before it as a regularly litigated case in law. Though especially founded by the Constitution, it has no peculiar power under the Constitution, and stands in no peculiar relation either to that or to acts of Congress. It has no other power to decide on the constitutional legality of an act of Congress or an act of a State legislature, or of a public officer, than every court, State and National, high and low, possesses and is bound to exercise. It is simply the national court of last appeal.

In the different States such tribunals have been established as each State by its constitution and legislation has seen fit to adopt.

同类推荐
热门推荐
  • 凤逆九天:嗜血妖妃倾天下

    凤逆九天:嗜血妖妃倾天下

    被家族抛弃的灵力废物?殊不知她身怀异世功法拥不死之身。被王爷厌恶的正妃?谁曾想王爷在她眼中不过蝼蚁。被众人争相利用的棋子?到底谁利用谁且看得清楚些。她早已非人类,黑暗邪恶杀戮是她的代名词,打着诛杀旗号而来的人,不过是她的食物而已。逆我者,死!叛我者,死!扰我者,死!永生道路,唯她一人,披荆斩棘,踏血独行。“姑娘留步,既然你我一丘之貉,不如结伴而行?”他俊美的脸上笑容轻佻,伸手揽她入怀,“别跑,因为你跑不了,天涯海角碧落黄泉,我都追得上你。”
  • 英雄联盟传说

    英雄联盟传说

    符文之地的传说,瓦洛兰大陆的战争,一个崭新的英雄联盟世界就在这里开启。
  • 日记365

    日记365

    我以为,这样就不怕断篇了。这样就不需要起承转合了。这样就除非时间停止都不会丢失主线了。原来是我太天真,第一章还好点,第二章就开始抠细节了,一个句子都能让我想上几分钟。时间上暂时无法同步,3月15日发的第一章,到2016年,日期就开始重复了,准备在那时完结。相信会越写越快的。
  • 太保笑传

    太保笑传

    山河破碎,当中以商山洛水为枢纽,一时间群雄并起,商山女帝,西关太保,洛水月姬等各自扩张势力逐鹿问鼎,江山多娇,究竟花落谁家?且看我太保手段
  • 凤起沧溟

    凤起沧溟

    北月王朝,昭和六十九年三月,天现异象。凤凰涅槃,浴火重生。凤星降临,凤女诞生。世间传言,得凤女者得天下!特工火云,代号“火凤凰”,意外流落异世,成为云启国凤家三女。凤家三女,天生聋哑,性格懦弱,并且惨遭当朝太子悔婚。火云取代凤家三小姐,强势如昨,决定叛逃命运,决不做任人宰割的绵羊,于是离开凤家。提起凤家三小姐,众人闻之色变,男人捂住下体,女人捂住脸蛋……这是为何?这事还得从一个月前说起。世人皆知,凤家三女,自小愚钝,天生聋哑,更在一个月前,惨遭太子悔婚。谁料,她却因此性情大变……乱世万里苍穹,天下唯我独尊!
  • 日落情缘(最受学生喜爱的散文精粹)

    日落情缘(最受学生喜爱的散文精粹)

    《最受学生喜爱的散文精粹》从喧嚣中缓缓走来,如一位许久不见的好友,收拾了一路趣闻,满载着一眼美景,静静地与你分享。靠近它,你会忘记白日里琐碎的工作,沉溺于片刻的宁谧。靠近它,你也会忘却烦恼,还心灵一片晴朗。一个人在其一生中,阅读一些立意深远、具有丰富哲学思考的散文,不仅可以开阔视野,重新认识历史、社会、人生和自然,获得思想上的盎然新意,而且还可以学习中外散文名家高超而成熟的创作技巧。
  • 上海巴子

    上海巴子

    有这么一类群体,上海人叫他们乡下人,外地人叫他们上海人,他们自称是上海巴子,他们的标签是知青子女。三代人,祖辈与父辈、父辈与孙辈?渴求身份的认同,挣扎在城市的每个阶层。两个知青子女长大后走到一起的故事。
  • 三嫁豪门而不入

    三嫁豪门而不入

    她就不信,和她同年同月同日同时出生的女婴,全市的医院就找不到一个!豪门又怎么样?她才不会浪费自己的美好青春去学习所谓少奶奶课程!偏偏就是要三嫁豪门而不入,气死那个至今素未谋面的所谓未婚夫!可是,谁来告诉她,她在大学里爱得轰轰烈烈人尽皆知的男神,竟然就是……
  • 龙使狂枭

    龙使狂枭

    这一生天生天养不曾怕,这一世长路漫漫起伏不由我,这一路走来尝尽世间冷暖;这杀戮的时代,这强者的世界;伤痛滋养着我,欺骗慰藉着我。是懦弱不堪还是一代强者?是任人欺辱还是使人畏敬?我知道无论怎样都要活下去!不为那诸多的羁绊只为证明我存在的意义!我叫凌天,曾决意要夺取四色龙灵一心想要傲世凌云,武贯周天的平凡少年。这是属于我的世界,开始书写我危机惊险的另类人生!
  • 玄冰

    玄冰

    倚剑向天,斩情仇,削是非。不为成仙,只为正道人间!